Respuesta :
Answer:
Among the options given on the question the correct answer is option B.
The Bill of Rights did not apply at the state level.
Explanation: The background of the Barron vs Baltimore case was a law suit filed by John Barron against the city of Baltimore. He claimed that Baltimore city had possessed his private property without any proper compensation. According to Bill of Rights he filed this law suit and the court ordered city to pay Barron. But an appellate court reversed the decision. Then Baron appealed to the Supreme court.
In 1833, Supreme court gave the decision in favor of the city. The cpourt asserted that the Bill of Rights is only effective with the federal government. Because the federal government is created according to the constitution and federal government is bound to follow the constitution rules like as bill of rights.But the states government is not bound to follow the Bill of Rights.
Therefore, the answer is option B.
The Supreme Court’s decision in Barron v. Baltimore in 1833 was: The Bill of Rights did not apply at the state level. This implies the correct answer is B.
In 1833, the Supreme Court delivered a judgment in the case of Barron v. Baltimore. In its ruling, the Supreme Court ruled that the bill of right as enshrine in the constitution of the United States only restricts the power of the Federal government and not applicable to state governments.
Further Explanation
The case started after John Barron approached the state court to file a lawsuit against the city of Baltimore. John Barron in his argument claimed that the city has denied him of his property, which he told the court was in total violation of the Fifth Amendment, which states that a person must be fully compensated before private poverty can be taken by the government.
John Barron claimed the government has destabilized his wharf by placing sand that was cleared from road construction around his business premises.
However, the state court ruled in support of John baron and awarded the sum of $4,000 against the State. The city of Baltimore also approached the appellate court to appeal the decision of the state court and the amount awarded to John Barron was reversed.
John Barron appealed his case to the Supreme Court and the court ruled that the bill of right is not applicable to state government and held that the action of the city of Baltimore was not in violation of the Fifth Amendment.
LEARN MORE:
- What was the Supreme Court's decision in Barron v. Baltimore in 1833? https://brainly.com/question/13748578
- What was the supreme court’s decision in barron v. Baltimore in 1833? https://brainly.com/question/13939380
KEYWORDS:
- supreme court
- barron v. baltimore
- wharf
- state court
- 1833
