You visit an animal shelter and are in a financial position to either adopt a single dog for $500 or donate the $500 to marginally improve the welfare for all dogs at the shelter by providing each dog with slightly better bedding and food. Assume that by marginally increasing the welfare of the rest of the dogs in shelter, this enhances the likelihood that they will be adopted. Of the options below, which is the best choice from an economics perspective and does it make a difference whether this is a “no-kill” shelter, where dogs’ lives would not be in danger without your assistance? Again, there is no singularly correct response, but you need to clearly articulate why you chose that answer. Also, think about which might be the most "economically sound" choice and if/why that might differ from your response, and how your knowledge of these economic theories might lend themselves to political interests and considerations. Be sure to note any biases or assumptions of the question or your reasoning. Donate the $500 to all the dogs. It doesn’t matter if it is a no-kill shelter or not, it is better to help each animal a little bit than to help just one a great deal. Adopt the single dog. The increased help you can give one animal does more good than a small amount of help for all dogs in the shelter. Donate the $500 to all of the dogs. The total amount of welfare given does depends on the shelter type.

Question

03-11-2019
Business

contestada

You visit an animal shelter and are in a financial position to either adopt a single dog for $500 or donate the $500 to marginally improve the welfare for all dogs at the shelter by providing each dog with slightly better bedding and food. Assume that by marginally increasing the welfare of the rest of the dogs in shelter, this enhances the likelihood that they will be adopted. Of the options below, which is the best choice from an economics perspective and does it make a difference whether this is a “no-kill” shelter, where dogs’ lives would not be in danger without your assistance? Again, there is no singularly correct response, but you need to clearly articulate why you chose that answer. Also, think about which might be the most "economically sound" choice and if/why that might differ from your response, and how your knowledge of these economic theories might lend themselves to political interests and considerations. Be sure to note any biases or assumptions of the question or your reasoning. Donate the $500 to all the dogs. It doesn’t matter if it is a no-kill shelter or not, it is better to help each animal a little bit than to help just one a great deal. Adopt the single dog. The increased help you can give one animal does more good than a small amount of help for all dogs in the shelter. Donate the $500 to all of the dogs. The total amount of welfare given does depends on the shelter type.

Respuesta :

Otras preguntas

Mariah is an adolescent. She idolizes Gisele Bundchen, the famous supermodel. Mariah desires to be skinny like Gisele because she believes that being thin is co

What number is halfway between 1/2 and 0.85? Explain

According to Article II, what are the qualifications for the job of president? Check all that apply. a natural-born citizen at least thirty-five years of age at

which transformations could have occurred to map ABC ?

There are 100 sophomores at the school. 85% of them are good students. What would be the percent of good students at school if (rounding the answer to the neare

In chapter 20 in the book treasure island, why does the captain pointedly disagree when silver calls himself captain

The infrared radiation traveling toward Earth is _____.

Calliope cuts her arms whenever she feels overwhelmed by strong emotions, abruptly changes from laughter to anger, and needs constant reassurance from others to

Determine the amount of money you will have if you deposit $108,000 for 25 years at 8% annual interest, compounded quarterly.

Your ta tells you to make 200ml of a 1 wt% agno3 solution in ethanol, because the stockroom just ran out of the stuff. how would you do this?

fernandoalonsoc fernandoalonsoc · Answer 1 · 2019-11-12T15:23:16+01:00

Answer:

I chose to adopt one animal even though from an economic point of view it is better to subsidies the foundation as a whole as more animals get an individual benefit from that donation. In the long run is better for my own interest to have an animal that shares and space and time with me rather to have more healthy animals. This thinking is based on the assumption that I need to fulfill my needs first before trying to fulfill society needs.