25. WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING BEST DESCRIBES MINORS’ CONTRACTS?

(A) INVALID
(B) VOID
(C) VOIDABLE
(D) UNENFORCEABLE
(E) CONDITIONAL

26. IN ORDER FOR A MINOR TO DISAFFIRM A CONTRACT, HE MUST ​USUALLY SHOW – IN ADDITION TO HIS MINORITY – THAT:

(A) THE CONTRACT WAS UNFAIR TO HIM
(B) THE OTHER PARTY HAD HAD MORE BUSINESS EXPERIENCE THAN HE
(C) THE CONTRACT WAS AN ORAL ONE, AND THAT THERE WAS AT LEAST SOME DISAGREEMENT AS TO ITS TERMS
(D) A SPECIFIC STATE STATUTE PERMITS HIM TO DISAFFIRM
(E) NONE OF THE ABOVE

27. DORIS PURCHASED A NEW AUTOMOBILE ON CREDIT WHEN SHE WAS ​SIXTEEN YEARS OLD. TWO DAYS AFTER HER NINETEENTH BIRTHDAY ​SHE SOUGHT TO RESCIND HER OBLIGATION TO MAKE FURTHER ​PAYMENTS. ASSUMING THAT EIGHTEEN IS THE AGE OF MAJORITY, ​THE CAR DEALER WOULD:

(A) BE ABLE TO ENFORCE HER OBLIGATION SINCE DORIS HAD RATIFIED THE CONTRACT

(B) NOT BE ABLE TO ENFORCE HER OBLIGATION SINCE DORIS HAD NOT RATIFIED THE CONTRACT

(C) BE ABLE TO ENFORCE HER OBLIGATION SINCE THE CAR DEALER WAS A COMPETENT PARTY AT ALL TIMES

(D) NOT BE ABLE TO ENFORCE HER OBLIGATION SINCE DORIS DID NOT RATIFY THE CONTRACT PRIOR TO HER EIGHTEENTH BIRTHDAY

28. AN EXCULPATORY CLAUSE IS A PROVISION OF CONTRACT THAT:

(A) REQUIRES EXTRA PROTECTION BY ONE PARTY
(B) EXCLUDES AN OPTION CONTRACT
(C) DISCLAIMS LIABILITY
(D) IS NEVER UPHELD BY THE COURTS















29. EXCULPATORY CLAUSES IN BAILEES’ CONTRACTS ARE USUALLY HELD ​TO BE:

(A) ILLEGAL, IF THE COURT FEELS THAT THEY WERE NOT PROPERLY COMMUNICATED TO THE BAILOR

(B) ILLEGAL – EVEN IF THEY ARE PROPERLY COMMUNICATED TO THE BAILOR – IF THEIR TERMS PURPORT TO FREE THE BAILEE FROM LIABILITY ARISING OUT OF THE BAILEE’S NEGLIGENCE

(C) LEGAL, IF PROPERLY COMMUNICATED TO THE BAILOR (EVEN IF THEY PURPORT TO FREE THE BAILEE FROM LIABILITY ARISING OUT OF THE BAILEE’S NEGLIGENCE)

(D) A AND C

30. STATUTES INVOLVING USURY:

(A) ARE ILLEGAL
(B) LIMIT THE AMOUNT OF INTEREST THAT MAY BE CHARGED ON LOANS
(C) CAN ONLY BE FEDERAL STATUTES
(D) CAN ONLY BE STATE STATUTES

Need help please, thanks