Imagine that you have to convince an audience to adopt your opinion on health care reform, but the specific arguments that your team has selected for your presentation are weak. According to research on attitude change, what should you do to increase your chances of being persuasive despite your weak arguments?

As per the question, the most appropriate way to improve the possibility of being persuasive regardless of weak arguments is 'stating the arguments with confidence' as confidence plays a vital role in leaving a positive impact on the readers. Nervousness in presenting the information not only leaves a negative impact on the audience and leaves them confused but also reduces the impact and credibility of arguments which may evoke a negative response. While the display of confidence in portrayal not only strengthens the speaker's ability to not only gain the audience's attention and interest but also deal with negative points or criticism positively and effectively. This eventually establishes the credibility of the speaker's argument and elicit the desired response(accepting and believing in claims).