Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that :
population mean μ = 120
sample size n = 37
sample mean x = 111
standard deviation = 21
The null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis can be computed as:
The null hypothesis:
[tex]\mathbf{ H_o: \mu = 120 }[/tex]
The alternative hypothesis:
[tex]\mathbf{ H_o: \mu \neq 120 }[/tex]
Since this test is two-tailed, the value for the test statistics can be computed as:
[tex]z = \dfrac{\overline x - \mu}{\dfrac{\sigma }{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]
[tex]z = \dfrac{111 - 120}{\dfrac{21}{\sqrt{37}}}[/tex]
[tex]z = \dfrac{-9}{\dfrac{21}{6.08}}[/tex]
z = -2.605
z = -2.61
Since this is a two-tailed test
P-value = 2(z < -2.61)
From the z table;
P-value = 2(0.0045)
P -value = 0.009
Decision rule: To reject the null hypothesis if the p-value is lesser than the level of significance
Conclusion: We reject the null hypothesis since the p-value is lesser than the level of significance. Thus, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the average breaking distance differs from 120 feet.