1. When deciding if two texts disagree, what does it mean to make a judgment about a particular set of facts? create an argument

a. draw a conclusion

b. form an interpretation

c. do an analysis

2. What does it mean when two authors disagree on matters of fact?

a. The authors share the disadvantages of a topic.

b. The authors present opposing information on the same topic.

c. The authors use different sources to support the same argument.

d. The authors share the same opinion on different topics.

3. When you are trying to understand a topic and come across conflicting information on a topic, what should you do first?

a. identify where exactly the texts disagree

b. look for other topics on which the same authors disagree

c. looks for topics on which the same authors agree

d. decide with which text you agree

4. Why might two texts on the same topic disagree?

a. The authors share a similar judgment about the set of facts.

b. The authors interpret the facts differently.

c. The authors identify the same sources from which they base their arguments.

d. The authors present the factual information in different formats.

5. When applying technology to identify text disagreement, what is a key word?

a. a word that provides the answers to different questions that are in the texts

b. a word that provides the facts that are different between texts

c. a word that shows the importance of disagreeing on facts

d. a word that shows sources that offer more information about the point on which the texts differ

1) A: When deciding if two texts disagree, to make a judgment about a particular set of facts means to draw a conclusion because while we are judging the facts, we are actually drawing a conclusion about the texts.

The rest of the options are incorrect because we are neither forming an interpretation nor doing an analysis when we are making the judgment about the texts.

2) B: When two authors disagree on matters of fact it means that the authors present opposing information on the same topic. Their disagreement arises from presenting of opposing information on the same topic being discussed.

The rest of the options are incorrect because when two authors disagree on matters of fact they are not sharing the disadvantages of a topic or the authors are not using different sources to support the same argument or the authors do not share the same opinion on different topics.

3) A: When you are trying to understand a topic and come across conflicting information on a topic, first you should identify where exactly the texts disagree, because that will help to find out where exactly the differences in the information is arising to have a better understanding.

The rest of the options are incorrect because in case of conflicting information we don’t look for other topics on which the same authors disagree or looks for topics on which the same authors agree or decide with which text you agree.

4) B: Two texts on the same topic might disagree because the authors interpret the facts differently. It simply means that the authors may have different perceptions and different interpretations about the topic under consideration.

The rest of the options are incorrect because two texts on the same topic might disagree and it occurs not because of sources or formats or similar judgments.

5) D: When applying technology to identify text disagreement, a key word would be a word that shows sources that offer more information about the point on which the texts differ because there can be many similarities between two texts, but the dissimilarities would help in properly identifying the disagreement.

The rest of the options are incorrect because a key word showing differences is way more helpful than any of the other options mentioned.

For more information, click on the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/18991398?referrer=searchResults