Answer:
.
Explanation:
The motor vehicle, as one critic stated, “has a voracious urge for food for land.” Urban sprawl in post-World War II America did no longer observe a clear, regular pattern of outward development, however, however a sort of “leapfrog nature of city growth” that scattered people, businesses, and enterprise over a extensive panorama with sizable patches of vacant or empty land interspersed amongst tracts of homes, industrial strips alongside roadsides, and a range of low-density makes use of of a range of types. Ultimately, metropolitan increase morphed into megalopolitan improvement with urbanization stretching for 200 miles from Santa Barbara to San Diego, with Houston engulfing greater than 600 rectangular miles, and with the nation’s capital section of an city matrix extending northward to New York City and southward to Richmond. In the late 1990s, Chicago accounted for solely six percentage of the land region of its metropolitan region. The vehicle was once the best mode of transportation in this terrain, and if it was once now not accountable for inflicting sprawl, it definitely fed the impulse. Sprawl grew to be synonymous with the automobile.
Cars grew to become each forces of diffusion and cohesion, supporting to trade the scale and structure of suburbanization properly earlier than World War II.
Answer:
A growth in affordable automobiles and highways contributed to the growth of suburbs by allowing wealthier white families to still keep their jobs in the inner city, but not have to live there. They could now live in nicer, safer areas outside of the city and commute to work.
