Respuesta :
Answer:
By advoacting imagery and figurative language within there work, Montague uses imagery, Heynen uses both figurative language and imagery.
Ex. Heyen: ‘Tree branches, glistened like glass. Then broke like glass’ (Smilie) “Some of them lifted their heads and turned them from side to side, but they were blindfolded with ice and didn’t flush.” (Metaphor)
Ex: Montague: ‘It was still breast warm
Where I curved in my hand
To count them, one by one
Into his cold palm, a kind
Of trophy or offering.’
‘When I saw him take
And break them, one by one
Against a sunlit stone"
In "What Happened During The Ice Storm" the author uses literal words and immersive sentences to present the theme, while the poem "The Fight" uses figurative language and subjective sentences to present his theme.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- “What Happened During The Ice Storm” is a short story about boys who brave the extreme cold to help a group of pheasants who were trapped in the blizzard.
- The author presents the theme related to the tendency of humans to protect those who cannot protect themselves.
- The author uses direct language and literal sense to express this theme, reinforcing the use of imagery to create immersive sentences.
- “The Fight” has a similar theme, as it shows that the beauty of nature can encourage humans to protect it.
- That's because this poem shows a man who harbors a grudge against a childhood friend who broke the bird eggs he was protecting.
- In this case, the poet shows a more subjective language, with the strong use of words in a figurative sense that reinforces the resentment and deepens the speaker's revolt.
With that, we can affirm that the two poems, use appropriate resources for each type of text, to reinforce the proposed themes.
More information:
https://brainly.com/question/19886083