Considering the two philosopher's beliefs about how to deal with the unjust government I agreed with the belief that "If the government violates those rights (natural rights - life, liberty, and property), people are justified in rebelling."
This is because such beliefs will help the citizens' rights to be protected against the unjust ruling and it will prevent autocratic ruling or abuse of power by those in position to exercise it or those in government.
Also, such beliefs keep the government on their toes as they ensure to work in the interest of the citizens rather than their own selfish interests. When the government officials understand that they can be removed and replaced at any time they are found wanting or not working towards the interest of the people they are supposed to serve or lead, they will certainly do things right.
Hence, in this case, I believed that the most ideal belief that would help any nation to be governed with fairness and equality is the belief that If the government violates those rights (natural rights - life, liberty, and property), people are justified in rebelling. And this is the belief I agree with.
Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/668819
