Read the excerpt from Carlito’s letter to the editor.

College athletes should be paid for playing sports. They bring in revenue for their teams by attracting both sponsors and crowds. Shouldn’t the athletes get a share of this money? They must keep up their grades in addition to their many hours of training each day. If students working in the campus bookstore can get paid, there is no reason that the athletes should not be paid as well. The athletes are working as hard as—if not harder than—bookstore employees.

What evidence does the author use to support the faulty analogy in this excerpt?

College sports bring in significant revenue.
College athletes attract sponsors and crowds.
College sports are as important to colleges as bookstores are.
College athletes work as hard as those with campus jobs.

The author uses a false relationship between university games and university bookstores.
He uses this to show that students who work in bookstores receive salaries, but university players don't, but they are of equal importance.
The evidence that the author shows to confirm this relationship is that college games are as important as bookstores.
However, both the relationship and the evidence convey an incorrect idea.

Bookstores are part of the educational system that universities should promote, university games are not. In addition, many college athletes have scholarships, while students working in the campus do so for salaries or lower funding.

You can find more information about false analogy at the link:

https://brainly.com/question/1235960