DEDUCTIVE
1. The argument presented in the first statement is an example of an incorrect use of deductive reasoning. Deductive reasoning involves drawing a specific conclusion based on general premises or principles. However, in this case, the conclusion that Russian Roulette is safe cannot be logically deduced from the fact that 100% of the surveyed individuals survived. The sample size is small, and it is possible that in other instances, people may not survive playing Russian Roulette. Therefore, this argument should be classified as an example of faulty deductive reasoning. 2. The argument presented in the second statement is an example of inductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning involves making generalizations or drawing probable conclusions based on specific observations or evidence. In this case, Billingsford observed that each time he pressed the button, a distant bell rang. Based on these repeated observations, he concluded that the button was causing the bell to ring. Although this conclusion may not be guaranteed, it is a reasonable inference based on the evidence available. Therefore, this argument can be classified as an example of inductive reasoning. 3. The argument presented in the third statement is an example of deductive reasoning. Deductive reasoning involves drawing a specific conclusion based on general premises or principles. In this case, the general premise is that all cows are bovines. The specific premise is that Herefords are cows. From these premises, we can logically conclude that Herefords are bovines. This argument follows the structure of deductive reasoning, where the conclusion is necessarily true if the premises are true. Therefore, this argument can be classified as an example of deductive reasoning.
Pls mark me brainliest! I’m so close
