Respuesta :

Answer:

a) not congruent

b) congruent

c) congruent

Step-by-step explanation:

a) not congruent because the length 10cm on the bottom triangle is opposite to the angle but it’s adjacent to the angle on the top one

b) congruent

c) congruent because if you work out the missing angle in both triangles you will find that in the top one it is 59 degrees and the bottom it is 83 degrees therefore the length 6m is on the side adjacent to both 83 degrees and 59 degrees

hope this helps :)

Answer:

[tex]\text{a. Congruent}\\\text{b. Not congruent}\\\text{c. Congruent}[/tex]

Explanation:

[tex]\text{a. These triangles are isosceles triangle, so both triangles have two equal}\\\text{base angles 64}^\text{o}\text{ and }64^\text{o}. \text{With this information, these triangles can be proved}\\\text{congruent by A.A.S. postulate.}[/tex]

[tex]\text{b. There is no enough information that can verify the triangles to be congruent.}[/tex]

[tex]\text{c. The third angle in the first triangle will be 59}^\text{o}\text{ and the third angle in the}\\\text{second triangle will be }83^\text{o}.\text{ This makes the triangles congruent eventually by}\\\text{A.A.S. postulate.}[/tex]