If someone is an advocate of the philosophy of judicial restraint, he or she believes question 4 options: that the meaning of the law tends to evolve over time. in looking only at the words of the constitution in order to understand its meaning. that the court should beware of overturning the judgments of popularly elected legislatures. the court should go beyond the words of the constitution or a statute to consider the broader societal implications of its decisions. that judges should consider legal questions rather than deciding political matters.

Question

02-05-2018
Social Studies

contestada

If someone is an advocate of the philosophy of judicial restraint, he or she believes question 4 options: that the meaning of the law tends to evolve over time. in looking only at the words of the constitution in order to understand its meaning. that the court should beware of overturning the judgments of popularly elected legislatures. the court should go beyond the words of the constitution or a statute to consider the broader societal implications of its decisions. that judges should consider legal questions rather than deciding political matters.

Respuesta :

Otras preguntas

Determine whether the data in the tables below represent exponential or logistic growth. Year Population Size 2012 5 2013 25 2014 125 2015 185 2016 205

A patient has been experiencing severe, persistent allergy symptoms that are reduced when she takes an antihistamine. Before the treatment, this patient was l

Plz help Me with part c + d

Which of the following is an inorganic compound? AgNO3 C6H12 СНОН C₂H7N

How can the retrograde rotation of planets and orbits of moons be explained in a naturalistic way?

Andrew solved the following inequality, and his work is shown below: −4(x + 8) ≤ −2x + 50 −4x − 32 ≤ −2x + 50 −2x − 32 ≤ 50 −2x ≤ 82 x ≤ −41 What mistake did

come es imperativo o infinitivo

how do i do this its really hard!!!11111!!11!1!

major characteristics of hunting and gathering

What is the relative velocity between two cars moving in the opposite direction with velocity 20m/s

ahmedishaal ahmedishaal · Answer 1 · 2018-05-13T09:26:01+02:00

If someone is an advocate of the philosophy of judicial restraint, he or she believes "in looking only at the words of the Constitution in order to understand its meaning."

Judicial restraint is a theory of legal elucidation that urges judges to restrain the activity of their own power. It declares that judges should falter to strike down laws unless they are clearly illegal, however what considers clearly unlawful is itself a matter of some verbal confrontation.